Wiki Spaces


Get Help from Others

Q&A: Ask OpenMRS
Discussion: OpenMRS Talk
Real-Time: IRC Chat | Slack


Page tree
Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 29 Next »

This project is assigned to the OpenMRS 1.9 release milestone


OpenMRS has an explicit API which has not been cleanly or explicitly exposed through web services.  We have a REST module and SOAP-based module(s) where folks have done work in the area.  We need a clear and explicit strategy for supporting web services.


A single OpenMRS module to support the core web service needs.

Heavyweight vs. lightweight objects? This is similar to's approach. We could consider small & big versions objects OR consider having a standard object with the option to list additive properties (e.g., custom object).

Based on Canada's experience with WS, Returning a "summary" of objects in a list may lead to a chatty interaction.

Look at Google Charts.

Consider that we may want to support both publish & subscribe – i.e., OpenMRS may

Some notes here:

SOAP Style

  • Annotations to generate web services

Gliffy Macro Error

Cannot find a diagram with these parameters:

  • Name: Webservices DTO
  • Version: 1

Encounter DTO

  • uuid
  • datetime
  • encounter type (required)
    • required: uuid or name
  • location (optional)
    • required: uuid or name
  • patient (required)
    • required: uuid or identifier
    • optional: names
  • provider (required)
    • required: uuid
    • optional: identifier, names
  • observations (optional)
    • required: datetime, question concept uuid, answer (e.g., string, number, concept uuid, ...)
  • forms (optional)
    • required: uuid
    • optional: form name
  • orders (optional)


  • Base web services are in a module
  • We want to be able to support web services without needing to see/use the html page in the web application browser -- e.g., someone writing a PHP application could install the API + web service support by, for example, having an embedded jetty + h2 and making calls to the right port.

Do we want to use DTOs at the API level?

  • At this point, we can leave the Java objects with Hibernate magic (all object properties assumed to exist) and

Changes to the API

  • Eliminate the "magical save" -- i.e., editing an object in any context should not make/persist changes to the database.  This should *always* require a save method call.
  • Have an explicit approach for how "stubs" (e.g., new Concept(123)) can be used


  • Web services will need methods that allow for a list of desired properties to be defined at the time of getting an object to determine which "optional" properties are realized in the objects returned.
// something like this:
ws.getPatient(123) // default
ws.getPatient(123, [includeProperties: ["preferredName", "birthdate", "gender"]])
  • No cascading saves -- i.e., properties of objects that are sets are read-only and will require separate method(s) to modify them.
//we should support something like this
ws.addPersonName([patientId: 123, given: "Darius", family: "Jazayeri" ]);

// this will not work
def p = ws.getPatient(123)
p.names << ?[given: "Darius", family: "Jazayeri"]

Action Plan

  1. Web services will be developed as an augmentation to the existing API... that is, we will not rewrite the current API and then expose them as web services... we will write the web services as an independent activity, hoping that they inform the further maintenance and redevelopment of the existing API.
  2. We will use CXF as the framework.
    1. See ?Webservices.cxf Module

Assigned Developer(s)

?Saptarshi Purkayastha

Interested Parties and Mentors

?Ben Wolfe (mentor)

See Also

  • No labels