Our Subversion server is deprecated in favor of using Git and GitHub to store code going forward. This page remains here for legacy projects and historical accuracy.
See GitHub Conventions for the updated version
Code in the trunk should always build but does not always have to run smoothly.
The code in other branches does not have to compile or run. It is all up to the branch creator/maintainer(s).
The code in module branches does not have to compile or run. It is all up to the module source creator/maintainer(s).
The code in contrib branches does not have to compile or run. It is all up to the specific contributor(s).
The code in custom-builds is up to the specific contributor, but and is not for developing, see custom-builds
See also: Subversion Repository Layout
There are three types of commit access: admin, full, and partial. Developers without commit access can submit code through patches (via the developers list, attached to a ticket, or via a committer).
Anyone can become a partial committer. Email code at openmrs.org and request access for a module or branch. See committer subversion access for details on how to request repository access and what to include in your request.
After contributing a few non-trivial patches or enhancements to the system, a partial committer can be nominated for full commit access by a full committer . Decisions on granting full commit access are based on the consensus of existing full committers. Email code at openmrs.org to request. As described by the Subversion group, "the primary criterion for full commit access is good judgment."
Full committers can commit fixes and patches to trunk. A code review should be opened in crucible with at least (and probably at most) 2 devs on it: http://source.openmrs.org
Partial committers should not commit to trunk, but are allowed to commit obvious and straightforward bug fixes, or minor self-contained enhancements to existing features directly into trunk.
All other developers may submit bug-fix patches by attaching a patch file to a jira ticket. Any full committer may apply these patches to trunk. Full attribution should be given in the commit message (see commit comment conventions for formatting attribution below).
Any major feature additions or code overhauls should be submitted to a branch. Branching is quick, easy, and if done right, low-bandwidth – don't be afraid of it (see Subversion Branching and Merging Techniques).
All new features should be developed in a branch. This allows the developer to adhere to the policy of committing early and often much more easily than if the feature were developed directly on trunk (see Subversion Branching and Merging Techniques).
All developers are expected to watch source code that is committed (e.g., via rss) and give the one who is committing feedback. The committing developer must be open to suggestions and constructive criticism.
When a feature has been fully developed and tested, it can be merged back into trunk by a full committer. Merging "permission" should be acquired from the other full-access developers prior to the merge (see Subversion Branching and Merging Techniques).
We welcome outside developers to become partial access committers. For outside developers that would like to contribute something larger than a bug fix, a branch can be created and read/write access given to that developer. If you would like to have a branch created for you see Developers Guide
All module code will be placed under the /openmrs-modules folder in the repository. The name of the folder for the source code will be the name of the module id. The code stored in the repository must be open source, but does not have to be under the OPL. See also Module Licensing
The latest code goes under the trunk folder, the branches folder is used for trying out changes separate from trunk, and tags are copies of trunk at the time of a particular release. If you are not planning on a release cycle at first, we still encourage you to put your code into a "trunk" folder, since many modules eventually evolve to needing this structure. If you need to change to a branches/tags/trunk structure, see Module Branching.
Module authors are encouraged to mimic the OpenMRS versioning style: major.minor.maintenance – e.g., 1.5.2.
Modules that work with a specific version of openmrs are encouraged to use 1.5.x-compatible or 1.4.x-compatible as the branch name inside their module.
To request space for a new module see requesting a module/project of the Code Repository page.
Source code for forgotten, no longer supported, and/or abandoned modules may be moved to the /openmrs-modules/abandoned/ folder.
A space for custom builds is provided within the repository to facilitate the process of combining specific releases with features from subsequent releases and/or unreleased patches. While applying patches to a specific release may often require some small tweaks to the code to accommodate interval changes, we do NOT want people doing development within these custom builds. All development should occur within patches or branches. Developers who run off and start using a custom build to commit all their new code risk being publicly castigated and/or losing their commit rights.
Each custom build should have a README file in the root folder describing what changes are in that build. This allows anyone else that might want to use those same features to quickly know how that build is compiled.
Each custom build is suggested to have a set of patches in the repository that have been applied. This helps when upgrading and is another tool that gives other developers insight into what that custom build contains.
All new code that is committed to custom-builds should get a ticket that either points at the changeset or gets the patch attached to it. This will help to make sure that a fix isn't going into a custom-build and then forgotten about. The rest of the community suffers when this happens.
This section outlines the different scenarios and sections in which commits occur. Find the one
that best matches yours and follow that.
Note that code commit comments and ticket comments are linked in jira via key characters:
where "Fixing feature XXX" is a descriptive sentence about the error/function being corrected and TRUNK-123 is the jira ticket id.
Adding functionality X
Where 123 and 234 are the revision start and end numbers for the merge.
Where 123 and 234 are the revision start and end numbers for that merge.
Where 123 is the ticket the patch came from and bwolfe is the author's openmrs/svn username.
Be sure to attribute the patch author(s) in the comment so we can track and properly attribute contributions.
To allow patch authors to be properly credited in an automated fashion, attribution should be on a separate line starting with "author:" followed by the OpenMRS ID of the contributor(s) separated by commas.
For information about submitting patches to OpenMRS, see our pages on patches.
See requesting subversion repository access for how to request a new branch.
Creating foo-bar branch to do XX features so that YY functionality. Approved by mseaton